國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

The logic of responsibility voids

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The logic of responsibility voidsby Hein Duijf.
Author:	Duijf, Hein.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022.
Description:	xi, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Responsibility.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7
ISBN:	9783030926557$q(electronic bk.)

The logic of responsibility voids
Duijf, Hein.

The logic of responsibility voids[electronic resource] /by Hein Duijf. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xi, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science,v. 4562542-8292 ;. - Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science ;v.375..

1. Introduction: The Problem of Responsibility Voids -- 2. Games and Agency -- 3. Collective Obligations, Group Plans, and Individual Actions -- 4. Guilty Minds and Collective Know-how -- 5. Joint Action, Participatory Intentions, and Team Reasoning -- 6. Practical Reasoning and Cooperation -- 7. Conclusion: The Conditions for Responsibility Voids and Gaps.

This book focuses on the problem of responsibility voids: these are cases where responsibility for a morally undesirable outcome cannot be attributed to any of the involved agents. Responsibility voids are thought to occur in collective decision-making and in the context of artificial intelligent systems. In these cases, philosophers worry that there is a shortfall of moral responsibility. In particular, such voids are often assumed to justify a notion of collective responsibility that cannot be reduced to individual responsibility. One of the aims of the book is to study how collective responsibility and joint action relate to individual responsibility and individual actions. The book offers a unifying framework for modelling moral responsibility by drawing from modal logic and game theory. The book investigates the possibility and scope of the problem of responsibility voids. One of its characteristics is its pluralistic perspective on moral responsibility: in contrast to giving a unique and all-encompassing definition of it, the book makes progress by spelling out and modelling several conceptions of moral responsibility. One of the appealing features of the book is that a relatively small range of models is used to investigate a variety of conceptions of moral responsibility. The unifying framework can thus be used to characterize the conditions under which responsibility voids are ruled out.

ISBN: 9783030926557$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

179265
Responsibility.

LC Class. No.: BJ1451

Dewey Class. No.: 170

The logic of responsibility voids
LDR:02844nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 623514
003 DE-He213
005 20220307182527.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 221209s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030926557$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030926540$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-92655-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BJ1451
072 7 $a HPQ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI005000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 170 $2 23
090 $a BJ1451 $b .D873 2022
100 1 $a Duijf, Hein. $3 925748
245 1 4 $a The logic of responsibility voids $h [electronic resource] / $c by Hein Duijf.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a xi, 189 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science, $x 2542-8292 ; $v v. 456
505 0 $a 1. Introduction: The Problem of Responsibility Voids -- 2. Games and Agency -- 3. Collective Obligations, Group Plans, and Individual Actions -- 4. Guilty Minds and Collective Know-how -- 5. Joint Action, Participatory Intentions, and Team Reasoning -- 6. Practical Reasoning and Cooperation -- 7. Conclusion: The Conditions for Responsibility Voids and Gaps.
520 $a This book focuses on the problem of responsibility voids: these are cases where responsibility for a morally undesirable outcome cannot be attributed to any of the involved agents. Responsibility voids are thought to occur in collective decision-making and in the context of artificial intelligent systems. In these cases, philosophers worry that there is a shortfall of moral responsibility. In particular, such voids are often assumed to justify a notion of collective responsibility that cannot be reduced to individual responsibility. One of the aims of the book is to study how collective responsibility and joint action relate to individual responsibility and individual actions. The book offers a unifying framework for modelling moral responsibility by drawing from modal logic and game theory. The book investigates the possibility and scope of the problem of responsibility voids. One of its characteristics is its pluralistic perspective on moral responsibility: in contrast to giving a unique and all-encompassing definition of it, the book makes progress by spelling out and modelling several conceptions of moral responsibility. One of the appealing features of the book is that a relatively small range of models is used to investigate a variety of conceptions of moral responsibility. The unifying framework can thus be used to characterize the conditions under which responsibility voids are ruled out.
650 0 $a Responsibility. $3 179265
650 0 $a Logic. $3 180785
650 1 4 $a Moral Philosophy and Applied Ethics. $3 910948
650 2 4 $a Microeconomics. $3 182798
650 2 4 $a Computer Modelling. $3 913151
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Synthese library, studies in epistemology, logic, methodology, and philosophy of science ; $v v.375. $3 739403
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92655-7
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)