國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Internationalizing higher education with national characteristicssimilar global trends but different responses /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Internationalizing higher education with national characteristicsby Min Hong.
Reminder of title:	similar global trends but different responses /
Author:	Hong, Min.
Published:	Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2022.
Description:	xiii, 151 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Education, HigherInternational cooperation.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4082-8
ISBN:	9789811940828$q(electronic bk.)

Internationalizing higher education with national characteristicssimilar global trends but different responses /
Hong, Min.

Internationalizing higher education with national characteristicssimilar global trends but different responses /[electronic resource] :by Min Hong. - Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2022. - xiii, 151 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Literature Review, theoretical framework and methodology -- Chapter 3: Macro-Lens of IHE: National Rationales, Objectives and Strategic Priorities in Australia and China -- Chapter 4: Meso-Lens of IHE: Collaboration and Competition between Universities in Australia and China -- Chapter 5: Micro-Lens of IHE: Inflow and Outflow Mobility of People in Australia and China -- Chapter 6: Internationalizing HE with National Characteristics -- Chapter 7: Conclusion.

In an era of globalization, internationalization of higher education (IHE) has been constructed as an almost inevitable trend and has become a common pursuit of many nations in their higher education (HE) policies. This book focuses on two nations, China and Australia, in terms of this trend. The broadest aim of this book was to find out the interactive relationships between global and national pressures in policy development by comparing the international HE policies in China and Australia. The three categories, overarching meta-policies at the macrolevel (nation), institution focused policies at the mesolevel (universities), and people focused policies at the microlevel (individuals) are documented and analyzed. Similarities and differences are identified. Similarities include promoting and deepening IHE as one important agenda in national policies at the macrolevel in the two nations, promoting transnational cooperation in the provision of HE at the mesolevel, as well as increasing international student numbers and encouraging an outflow of student learning and exchanges at the microlevel. Differences include China's soft power initiatives and Australia's appeal for the sustainability of international HE as a national priority in the area of IHE at the macrolevel; the focus on "World Class Universities" construction in China and strengthening the overall HE system in Australia; and different issues in relation to people mobility and brain circulation-specifically, encouraging more outflow of students and attracting more inflow of talents and international students in China, and over-reliance on international students financially in Australia. It is suggested that different responses to the global trends reflect the specificities of each nation and the ways path-dependent factors mediate global pressures. This comparison will facilitate a better understanding of how globalization has affected and been responded to in IHE policies and enable a better understanding of their path-dependent mediation through a focus on two specific sets of national policies.

ISBN: 9789811940828$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-19-4082-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

533562
Education, Higher
--International cooperation.

LC Class. No.: LB2324 / .H65 2022

Dewey Class. No.: 378

Internationalizing higher education with national characteristicssimilar global trends but different responses /
LDR:03581nmm a2200313 a 4500 001 629091
003 DE-He213
005 20220825200811.0
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230224s2022 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789811940828$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789811940811$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-19-4082-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-19-4082-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a LB2324 $b .H65 2022
072 7 $a JNF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a EDU034000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JNF $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 378 $2 23
090 $a LB2324 $b .H772 2022
100 1 $a Hong, Min. $3 933640
245 1 0 $a Internationalizing higher education with national characteristics $h [electronic resource] : $b similar global trends but different responses / $c by Min Hong.
260 $a Singapore : $b Springer Nature Singapore : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a xiii, 151 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Literature Review, theoretical framework and methodology -- Chapter 3: Macro-Lens of IHE: National Rationales, Objectives and Strategic Priorities in Australia and China -- Chapter 4: Meso-Lens of IHE: Collaboration and Competition between Universities in Australia and China -- Chapter 5: Micro-Lens of IHE: Inflow and Outflow Mobility of People in Australia and China -- Chapter 6: Internationalizing HE with National Characteristics -- Chapter 7: Conclusion.
520 $a In an era of globalization, internationalization of higher education (IHE) has been constructed as an almost inevitable trend and has become a common pursuit of many nations in their higher education (HE) policies. This book focuses on two nations, China and Australia, in terms of this trend. The broadest aim of this book was to find out the interactive relationships between global and national pressures in policy development by comparing the international HE policies in China and Australia. The three categories, overarching meta-policies at the macrolevel (nation), institution focused policies at the mesolevel (universities), and people focused policies at the microlevel (individuals) are documented and analyzed. Similarities and differences are identified. Similarities include promoting and deepening IHE as one important agenda in national policies at the macrolevel in the two nations, promoting transnational cooperation in the provision of HE at the mesolevel, as well as increasing international student numbers and encouraging an outflow of student learning and exchanges at the microlevel. Differences include China's soft power initiatives and Australia's appeal for the sustainability of international HE as a national priority in the area of IHE at the macrolevel; the focus on "World Class Universities" construction in China and strengthening the overall HE system in Australia; and different issues in relation to people mobility and brain circulation-specifically, encouraging more outflow of students and attracting more inflow of talents and international students in China, and over-reliance on international students financially in Australia. It is suggested that different responses to the global trends reflect the specificities of each nation and the ways path-dependent factors mediate global pressures. This comparison will facilitate a better understanding of how globalization has affected and been responded to in IHE policies and enable a better understanding of their path-dependent mediation through a focus on two specific sets of national policies.
650 0 $a Education, Higher $x International cooperation. $3 533562
650 1 4 $a Educational Policy and Politics. $3 308819
650 2 4 $a International and Comparative Education. $3 338769
650 2 4 $a Higher Education. $3 276621
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4082-8
950 $a Education (SpringerNature-41171)