國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

The politics of metaphysics

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The politics of metaphysicsby Felipe G. A. Moreira.
Author:	Moreira, Felipe G. A.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022.
Description:	xvi, 257 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Metaphysics.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7
ISBN:	9783031123467$q(electronic bk.)

The politics of metaphysics
Moreira, Felipe G. A.

The politics of metaphysics[electronic resource] /by Felipe G. A. Moreira. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xvi, 257 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part 1. The Right-Wing Approach -- Chapter 2.The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Chapter 3. The Pseudo-Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Part 2. The Left-Wing Approach -- Chapter 4. Nietzsche vs. Carnap -- Chapter 5. Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche -- Chapter 6. Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap,- Chapter 7. Conclusion.

Since immemorial times, persons have been engaged in disputes in metaphysics. This book reacts to this fact by supporting five theses. Thesis 1 is that disputes are micro-wars that have a significant social importance; they involve conflicting parties who may resort to some kind of violence and depend on normative factors. Thesis 2 is that disputes can be approached from right-wing or left-wing stances. Thesis 3 is that the grounds for endorsing an approach to a dispute are problematic starting points that may be rationally rejected. Thesis 4 is that disputes have an incommensurable greatness. Thesis 5 is that right-wing approaches to disputes may be less appealing than the left-wing one championed by the book for those who endorse that one is to avoid expressing "subtle" violence. This is the violence expressed by those who suggest that others who disagree with one's criteria to deal with disputes fall short of logos or act as if such others did not exist. Dr Felipe G. A. Moreira worked as a Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Miami in Florida, USA. He also held the posts of Substitute Professor of Philosophy at Lavras Federal University in Minas Gerais, Brazil, and of Science, Technology and Society Lecturer at Code University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, Germany.

ISBN: 9783031123467$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

228630
Metaphysics.

LC Class. No.: BD111

Dewey Class. No.: 110

The politics of metaphysics
LDR:02590nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 631750
003 DE-He213
005 20221013142236.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230411s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031123467$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031123450$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-12346-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BD111
072 7 $a HPJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI013000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDTJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 110 $2 23
090 $a BD111 $b .M838 2022
100 1 $a Moreira, Felipe G. A. $3 937651
245 1 4 $a The politics of metaphysics $h [electronic resource] / $c by Felipe G. A. Moreira.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a xvi, 257 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction -- Part 1. The Right-Wing Approach -- Chapter 2.The Properly Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Chapter 3. The Pseudo-Non-Dogmatic "Subtle" Violence -- Part 2. The Left-Wing Approach -- Chapter 4. Nietzsche vs. Carnap -- Chapter 5. Friedrich Carnap: Rudolf Nietzsche -- Chapter 6. Beyond Nietzsche and Carnap,- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
520 $a Since immemorial times, persons have been engaged in disputes in metaphysics. This book reacts to this fact by supporting five theses. Thesis 1 is that disputes are micro-wars that have a significant social importance; they involve conflicting parties who may resort to some kind of violence and depend on normative factors. Thesis 2 is that disputes can be approached from right-wing or left-wing stances. Thesis 3 is that the grounds for endorsing an approach to a dispute are problematic starting points that may be rationally rejected. Thesis 4 is that disputes have an incommensurable greatness. Thesis 5 is that right-wing approaches to disputes may be less appealing than the left-wing one championed by the book for those who endorse that one is to avoid expressing "subtle" violence. This is the violence expressed by those who suggest that others who disagree with one's criteria to deal with disputes fall short of logos or act as if such others did not exist. Dr Felipe G. A. Moreira worked as a Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Miami in Florida, USA. He also held the posts of Substitute Professor of Philosophy at Lavras Federal University in Minas Gerais, Brazil, and of Science, Technology and Society Lecturer at Code University of Applied Sciences in Berlin, Germany.
650 0 $a Metaphysics. $3 228630
650 2 4 $a Philosophical Methods. $3 920531
650 2 4 $a Social Philosophy. $3 739817
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12346-7
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)