國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Fandom and polarization in online political discussionfrom pop culture to politics /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Fandom and polarization in online political discussionby Renee Barnes.
其他題名:	from pop culture to politics /
作者:	Barnes, Renee.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022.
面頁冊數:	xiii, 164 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Social mediaPolitical aspects.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6
ISBN:	9783031140396$q(electronic bk.)

Fandom and polarization in online political discussionfrom pop culture to politics /
Barnes, Renee.

Fandom and polarization in online political discussionfrom pop culture to politics /[electronic resource] :by Renee Barnes. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xiii, 164 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Introduction -- Part 1 - The missing link: Fandom and anti-fandom and polarized political discussion -- Chap 1 - Polarization and online debate: Getting down in the muck -- Chap 2 - Fan studies and polarization: Finding the fan and anti-fan -- Part 2: Fandom, politics and online debate -- Chap 3 - Fandom fuelling polarized behaviour: Loving to hate -- Chap 4 - Can we debate away the hate? -- Part 3 - Anti fandom and the rise of the fake news phenomenon -- Chap 5 - 'Fake news', polarization and anti-fandom -- Chap 6 - Examining the use of the fake news label in online political discussion: Believing the fake: -- Chap 7 - Conclusion.

This book takes an innovative fan studies approach to investigating one of the most pressing issues of contemporary times: polarization. Drawing on three years of observational data from Facebook political discussions, as well as interviews and survey responses from those heavily engaged in online political debate, Barnes argues a fan-like investment in a political perspective initiates and drives polarization. She calls on us to move beyond the traditional Habermasian approach to political discussion, which privileges the rational and deliberative, and instead focus on how we perform the self. How we behave in these online debates is part of a performance, a performance of self, in which an affective investment in a particular political perspective drives a need to contribute, refute and 'other' those opposing. Because this performance stems from an emotional basis, judgments and contributions are often not rational or factual, but rather a form of establishing and defending an identity. Renne Barnes is senior lecturer in Journalism at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia.

ISBN: 9783031140396$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

583681
Social media
--Political aspects.

LC Class. No.: HM742

Dewey Class. No.: 302.231

Fandom and polarization in online political discussionfrom pop culture to politics /
LDR:02809nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 634085
003 DE-He213
005 20221222162125.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230511s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031140396$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031140389$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-14039-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a HM742
072 7 $a JPH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a GTC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPH $2 thema
072 7 $a GTC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 302.231 $2 23
090 $a HM742 $b .B261 2022
100 1 $a Barnes, Renee. $3 805698
245 1 0 $a Fandom and polarization in online political discussion $h [electronic resource] : $b from pop culture to politics / $c by Renee Barnes.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2022.
300 $a xiii, 164 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Part 1 - The missing link: Fandom and anti-fandom and polarized political discussion -- Chap 1 - Polarization and online debate: Getting down in the muck -- Chap 2 - Fan studies and polarization: Finding the fan and anti-fan -- Part 2: Fandom, politics and online debate -- Chap 3 - Fandom fuelling polarized behaviour: Loving to hate -- Chap 4 - Can we debate away the hate? -- Part 3 - Anti fandom and the rise of the fake news phenomenon -- Chap 5 - 'Fake news', polarization and anti-fandom -- Chap 6 - Examining the use of the fake news label in online political discussion: Believing the fake: -- Chap 7 - Conclusion.
520 $a This book takes an innovative fan studies approach to investigating one of the most pressing issues of contemporary times: polarization. Drawing on three years of observational data from Facebook political discussions, as well as interviews and survey responses from those heavily engaged in online political debate, Barnes argues a fan-like investment in a political perspective initiates and drives polarization. She calls on us to move beyond the traditional Habermasian approach to political discussion, which privileges the rational and deliberative, and instead focus on how we perform the self. How we behave in these online debates is part of a performance, a performance of self, in which an affective investment in a particular political perspective drives a need to contribute, refute and 'other' those opposing. Because this performance stems from an emotional basis, judgments and contributions are often not rational or factual, but rather a form of establishing and defending an identity. Renne Barnes is senior lecturer in Journalism at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia.
650 0 $a Social media $x Political aspects. $3 583681
650 0 $a Polarization (Social sciences) $x Political aspects. $3 940316
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (SpringerNature-41173)