國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsa case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsby Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas.
Reminder of title:	a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
Author:	Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023.
Description:	viii, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Double jeopardyEuropean Union countries.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6
ISBN:	9783031165566$q(electronic bk.)

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsa case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio.

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsa case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /[electronic resource] :by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - viii, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law,v. 82524-8057 ;. - Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law ;v.1..

Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.

The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.

ISBN: 9783031165566$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

946889
Double jeopardy
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: KJE9698 / .E83 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 345.04094

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsa case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
LDR:03479nmm a2200361 a 4500 001 640308
003 DE-He213
005 20230123192609.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 231025s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031165566$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031165559$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-16556-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJE9698 $b .E83 2023
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 345.04094 $2 23
090 $a KJE9698 $b .E74 2023
100 1 $a Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio. $3 946888
245 1 0 $a Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems $h [electronic resource] : $b a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU / $c by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2023.
300 $a viii, 222 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law, $x 2524-8057 ; $v v. 8
505 0 $a Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.
520 $a The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.
650 0 $a Double jeopardy $z European Union countries. $3 946889
650 0 $a Sanctions, Administrative $z European Union countries. $3 946890
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 913280
650 2 4 $a International Criminal Law. $3 558688
650 2 4 $a Human Rights. $3 558690
650 2 4 $a European Criminal Law. $3 861766
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law ; $v v.1. $3 824744
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)