國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Japan's rush to the Pacific Warthe institutional roots of overbalancing /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Japan's rush to the Pacific Warby Lionel P. Fatton.
其他題名:	the institutional roots of overbalancing /
作者:	Fatton, Lionel P.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023.
面頁冊數:	xxiii, 313 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	International Relations Theory.
標題:	JapanCongresses.Economic policy1989-
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22053-1
ISBN:	9783031220531$q(electronic bk.)

Japan's rush to the Pacific Warthe institutional roots of overbalancing /
Fatton, Lionel P.

Japan's rush to the Pacific Warthe institutional roots of overbalancing /[electronic resource] :by Lionel P. Fatton. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - xxiii, 313 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Palgrave studies in international relations. - Palgrave studies in international relations..

1. Overbalancing as a Systemic Pathology -- 2. Explaining Japan's Rush to the Pacific War -- 3. Appropriate Balancing in the Naval Arms Control Era, 1920-1931 -- 4. The Manchurian Crisis as an Exogenous Shock, 1931-1933 -- 5. Overbalancing and Japan's Rush to the Pacific War, 1933-1941 -- 6. Beyond Japan and the Pacific War.

This book investigates the phenomenon of overbalancing through an analysis of Japan's foreign policy during the interbellum. In the mid-1930s, Japan withdrew from a naval arms control framework that had restrained military buildup on both sides of the Pacific Ocean since the early 1920s. By doing so, Japan not only triggered a naval arms race with the United States that exhausted its economy, it also destroyed the last institutionalized structure regulating the relationship between the two Pacific powers. Japan and the United States became caught in a spiral of tensions that culminated with the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Puzzling is the fact that the international environment in the Asia-Pacific was relatively stable in the mid-1930s, while Washington was pursuing a policy of accommodation toward Tokyo. By rejecting arms control and engaging in unfettered naval expansion, Japan overbalanced against the United States and began its rush to the Pacific War. The book explains Japan's overbalancing with a neoclassical realist model that combines the literatures on threat perception and civil-military relations. Amid the Manchurian crisis of 1931-1933, as the Japanese government collaborated with the military institution to address the situation in China, military influence on the formulation of foreign policy surged. The perceptual and policy biases of the military, which include the tendency to distrust other countries' intentions, to adopt worst-case analyses of international dynamics and to strive to maximize military power, gradually penetrated the decision-making process. Dysfunctions in the preexisting structure of Japanese civil-military relations, engendered by an over-depoliticization of the military institution, allowed the navy to convince policymakers that the United States was inherently hostile to Japan, hence the necessity to prepare for war. The government was brainstormed, adopting the biased military perspective on international affairs. Japan overbalanced in a myopic but conscious way. Lionel P. Fatton is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Webster University Geneva, Switzerland, and Research Collaborator at the Research Institute for the History of Global Arms Transfer, Meiji University, Japan.

ISBN: 9783031220531$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-22053-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

774425
International Relations Theory.
Subjects--Geographical Terms:

381143
Japan
--Economic policy--1989- --Congresses.

LC Class. No.: D767.2

Dewey Class. No.: 327.52009043

Japan's rush to the Pacific Warthe institutional roots of overbalancing /
LDR:03680nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 640618
003 DE-He213
005 20230228190509.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 231025s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031220531$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031220524$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-22053-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-22053-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a D767.2
072 7 $a JPS $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPS $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 327.52009043 $2 23
090 $a D767.2 $b .F254 2023
100 1 $a Fatton, Lionel P. $3 947405
245 1 0 $a Japan's rush to the Pacific War $h [electronic resource] : $b the institutional roots of overbalancing / $c by Lionel P. Fatton.
260 $a Cham : $c 2023. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
300 $a xxiii, 313 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Palgrave studies in international relations
505 0 $a 1. Overbalancing as a Systemic Pathology -- 2. Explaining Japan's Rush to the Pacific War -- 3. Appropriate Balancing in the Naval Arms Control Era, 1920-1931 -- 4. The Manchurian Crisis as an Exogenous Shock, 1931-1933 -- 5. Overbalancing and Japan's Rush to the Pacific War, 1933-1941 -- 6. Beyond Japan and the Pacific War.
520 $a This book investigates the phenomenon of overbalancing through an analysis of Japan's foreign policy during the interbellum. In the mid-1930s, Japan withdrew from a naval arms control framework that had restrained military buildup on both sides of the Pacific Ocean since the early 1920s. By doing so, Japan not only triggered a naval arms race with the United States that exhausted its economy, it also destroyed the last institutionalized structure regulating the relationship between the two Pacific powers. Japan and the United States became caught in a spiral of tensions that culminated with the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. Puzzling is the fact that the international environment in the Asia-Pacific was relatively stable in the mid-1930s, while Washington was pursuing a policy of accommodation toward Tokyo. By rejecting arms control and engaging in unfettered naval expansion, Japan overbalanced against the United States and began its rush to the Pacific War. The book explains Japan's overbalancing with a neoclassical realist model that combines the literatures on threat perception and civil-military relations. Amid the Manchurian crisis of 1931-1933, as the Japanese government collaborated with the military institution to address the situation in China, military influence on the formulation of foreign policy surged. The perceptual and policy biases of the military, which include the tendency to distrust other countries' intentions, to adopt worst-case analyses of international dynamics and to strive to maximize military power, gradually penetrated the decision-making process. Dysfunctions in the preexisting structure of Japanese civil-military relations, engendered by an over-depoliticization of the military institution, allowed the navy to convince policymakers that the United States was inherently hostile to Japan, hence the necessity to prepare for war. The government was brainstormed, adopting the biased military perspective on international affairs. Japan overbalanced in a myopic but conscious way. Lionel P. Fatton is Assistant Professor of International Relations at Webster University Geneva, Switzerland, and Research Collaborator at the Research Institute for the History of Global Arms Transfer, Meiji University, Japan.
650 1 4 $a International Relations Theory. $3 774425
650 2 4 $a International Security Studies. $3 774426
651 0 $a Japan $x Economic policy $y 1989- $v Congresses. $3 381143
651 0 $a United States $3 236377
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Palgrave studies in international relations. $3 461770
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22053-1
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)