國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangitby Yifan Shang.
Author:	Shang, Yifan.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023.
Description:	viii, 129 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	LawPhilosophy.Europe
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6
ISBN:	9783031464676$q(electronic bk.)

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit
Shang, Yifan.

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit[electronic resource] /by Yifan Shang. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - viii, 129 p. :illustrations, digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v. 1102214-9902 ;. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ;v.10..

1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Similarities.-4. Differences -- 5. Conclusion.

This book explores the historical and legal importance of two principles, Quod Omnes Tangit, and Tianxia Wei Gong, which have played significant roles in European and Chinese political and legal history. While Quod Omnes Tangit has been thoroughly researched, Tianxia Wei Gong has not been systematically examined. This thesis fills this void and connects these two principles for the first time. Quod Omnes Tangit was initially introduced in Justinian's Codex Civil, while Tianxia Wei Gong originated from Liji, one of the books in a key series of works by Confucius. Liji is comparable to the Thora in the Old Testament and is considered as important as law in Chinese legal history. Both principles have undergone comparable developmental processes, with scholars contributing to their reinterpretation. This book thoroughly examines the interpretations of individual scholars, with particular attention given to Liang Qichao, who is the only one to have mentioned both Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit. The book also provides an explanation for the original discrepancies in their concepts, particularly their methodologies in distributing and legitimizing rights. This research will be of interest to legal philosophers and historians in both the Western and Eastern worlds, legal practitioners and policymakers, and researchers seeking to explain current events and explore fundamental differences between the East and West.

ISBN: 9783031464676$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

964680
Law
--Philosophy.--Europe

LC Class. No.: KJC383 / .S536 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 340.1

A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit
LDR:02665nmm a2200361 a 4500 001 653947
003 DE-He213
005 20231116114854.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 240426s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031464676$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031464669$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-46467-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJC383 $b .S536 2023
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.1 $2 23
090 $a KJC383 $b .S528 2023
100 1 $a Shang, Yifan. $3 964679
245 1 2 $a A historical and legal comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit $h [electronic resource] / $c by Yifan Shang.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2023.
300 $a viii, 129 p. : $b illustrations, digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, $x 2214-9902 ; $v v. 110
505 0 $a 1. Introduction -- 2. Methodology -- 3. Similarities.-4. Differences -- 5. Conclusion.
520 $a This book explores the historical and legal importance of two principles, Quod Omnes Tangit, and Tianxia Wei Gong, which have played significant roles in European and Chinese political and legal history. While Quod Omnes Tangit has been thoroughly researched, Tianxia Wei Gong has not been systematically examined. This thesis fills this void and connects these two principles for the first time. Quod Omnes Tangit was initially introduced in Justinian's Codex Civil, while Tianxia Wei Gong originated from Liji, one of the books in a key series of works by Confucius. Liji is comparable to the Thora in the Old Testament and is considered as important as law in Chinese legal history. Both principles have undergone comparable developmental processes, with scholars contributing to their reinterpretation. This book thoroughly examines the interpretations of individual scholars, with particular attention given to Liang Qichao, who is the only one to have mentioned both Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit. The book also provides an explanation for the original discrepancies in their concepts, particularly their methodologies in distributing and legitimizing rights. This research will be of interest to legal philosophers and historians in both the Western and Eastern worlds, legal practitioners and policymakers, and researchers seeking to explain current events and explore fundamental differences between the East and West.
650 0 $a Law $z Europe $x Philosophy. $3 964680
650 0 $a Social contract $x Philosophy. $3 964681
650 0 $a Law $z China $x Philosophy. $3 925158
650 0 $a Consent (Law) $z Europe $x History. $3 964682
650 0 $a Law $z Europe $x History. $3 198193
650 0 $a Consent (Law) $z China $x History. $3 964683
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 913280
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 557741
650 2 4 $a Asian History. $3 697923
650 2 4 $a Chinese Philosophy. $3 919960
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice ; $v v.10. $3 557755
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46467-6
950 $a History (SpringerNature-41172)