國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models.
Author:	Montgomery, Meg.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023
Description:	75 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.
Notes:	Advisor: Junglas, Iris.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-03.
Subject:	Finance.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30631576
ISBN:	9798380361019

Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models.
Montgomery, Meg.

Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023 - 75 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--College of Charleston, 2023.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the United States, public companies are required to submit form 8-K filings to the SEC within four days of any material event occurring. The timely nature of these announcements makes them important resources for investors, industry professionals, and researchers alike. As part of an 8-K filing, one Item, Item 5.02, is of particular interest as it announces the arrival and departure of key executive officers and board members. Machine learning and classification algorithms have been applied most commonly to 10-K and 10-Q SEC filings, but 8-K filings have only received little research attention. Studying the contents of 8-K filings by applying and comparing advanced classification algorithms is therefore of utmost importance. This study uses a big dataset of 8-K textual filings and applies 11 classification models via two different experiments: (a) identifying the Item based on 8-K textual inputs, and (b) categorizing the type of executive departure event described in Item 5.02. The study compares four traditional classification algorithms combined with two feature extraction techniques, a recurrent neural network model (LSTM), and two transformer models (SmallBERT and GPT-2).

ISBN: 9798380361019Subjects--Topical Terms:

183252
Finance.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Machine learning

Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models.
LDR:02336nmm a2200373 4500 001 655832
005 20240414211943.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 240620s2023 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798380361019
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30631576
035 $a AAI30631576
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Montgomery, Meg. $3 966975
245 1 0 $a Categorizing SEC 8-K Filings: A Comparison of Machine Learning Classification Models.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2023
300 $a 75 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-03.
500 $a Advisor: Junglas, Iris.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--College of Charleston, 2023.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the United States, public companies are required to submit form 8-K filings to the SEC within four days of any material event occurring. The timely nature of these announcements makes them important resources for investors, industry professionals, and researchers alike. As part of an 8-K filing, one Item, Item 5.02, is of particular interest as it announces the arrival and departure of key executive officers and board members. Machine learning and classification algorithms have been applied most commonly to 10-K and 10-Q SEC filings, but 8-K filings have only received little research attention. Studying the contents of 8-K filings by applying and comparing advanced classification algorithms is therefore of utmost importance. This study uses a big dataset of 8-K textual filings and applies 11 classification models via two different experiments: (a) identifying the Item based on 8-K textual inputs, and (b) categorizing the type of executive departure event described in Item 5.02. The study compares four traditional classification algorithms combined with two feature extraction techniques, a recurrent neural network model (LSTM), and two transformer models (SmallBERT and GPT-2).
590 $a School code: 1000.
650 4 $a Finance. $3 183252
650 4 $a Computer engineering. $3 212944
653 $a Machine learning
653 $a Executive officers
653 $a Algorithms
653 $a Neural network
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0464
710 2 $a College of Charleston. $b Data Science and Analytics. $3 966976
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-03.
790 $a 1000
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2023
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30631576