國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Copyright as a constraint on creating technological value

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Copyright as a constraint on creating technological valueby Kasper Drazewski.
作者:	Drazewski, Kasper.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2024.
面頁冊數:	vii, 180 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	InternetLaw and legislation.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6
ISBN:	9783031512766$q(electronic bk.)

Copyright as a constraint on creating technological value
Drazewski, Kasper.

Copyright as a constraint on creating technological value[electronic resource] /by Kasper Drazewski. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2024. - vii, 180 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm. - Law, governance and technology series,v. 632352-1910 ;. - Law, governance and technology series ;v.6..

1 introduction: legislating for the digital reality: a moving target -- 2. Welcoming digital innovation: why america seems to get it right -- 3. The mechanics of flexibility -- 4 Jewels in the sand: supporting creativity in a mass networked environment -- 5 EU (non) remedies to inflexible copyright: contracts as a policy tool -- 6 Courts of law v. Choke points for technological innovation -- 7 Conclusions.

Can we regulate something that doesn't exist yet? Can Europe create its own Silicon Valley? Who gets to create technological value in today's world? Whatever happened to the once-flourishing idea of rags to riches? Will new and exciting innovations only ever come from big tech companies? Can the EU establish its own flexible framework for boosting innovation, e.g. by facilitating the transformative use of technologies and data? This book seeks to answer these questions by exploring the differences in copyright culture in Europe and the United States, with its flexible fair use framework. The findings are anything but obvious, and decades of case law on both sides of the Atlantic tell a story of judges going to great lengths to deal with new challenges while navigating the imperfections of statutory law - both where it is too broadly formulated and where it is too prescriptive. How can the population's creative potential best be fostered? What do software innovations have in common with the evolution of living organisms? What are the vulnerabilities of distributed creativity? Answers are sought in the processes that came into being during the early years of the digital revolution and were then forced to take a back seat as control of the means of production was increasingly placed in the hands of tech companies. The findings and insights presented here are highly relevant for today's digital policymaking. Market concentration processes in innovation haven't ceased; they are ongoing. And in an age where data-driven services are creating and reinforcing global oligopolies, the question posed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Google v. Oracle is now more relevant than ever: who should hold the keys to digital innovation?

ISBN: 9783031512766$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

208276
Internet
--Law and legislation.

LC Class. No.: K564.C6

Dewey Class. No.: 343.0999

Copyright as a constraint on creating technological value
LDR:03209nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 663334
003 DE-He213
005 20240119080735.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 241203s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031512766$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031512759$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-51276-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K564.C6
072 7 $a LNJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 343.0999 $2 23
090 $a K564.C6 $b D769 2024
100 1 $a Drazewski, Kasper. $3 975546
245 1 0 $a Copyright as a constraint on creating technological value $h [electronic resource] / $c by Kasper Drazewski.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2024.
300 $a vii, 180 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Law, governance and technology series, $x 2352-1910 ; $v v. 63
505 0 $a 1 introduction: legislating for the digital reality: a moving target -- 2. Welcoming digital innovation: why america seems to get it right -- 3. The mechanics of flexibility -- 4 Jewels in the sand: supporting creativity in a mass networked environment -- 5 EU (non) remedies to inflexible copyright: contracts as a policy tool -- 6 Courts of law v. Choke points for technological innovation -- 7 Conclusions.
520 $a Can we regulate something that doesn't exist yet? Can Europe create its own Silicon Valley? Who gets to create technological value in today's world? Whatever happened to the once-flourishing idea of rags to riches? Will new and exciting innovations only ever come from big tech companies? Can the EU establish its own flexible framework for boosting innovation, e.g. by facilitating the transformative use of technologies and data? This book seeks to answer these questions by exploring the differences in copyright culture in Europe and the United States, with its flexible fair use framework. The findings are anything but obvious, and decades of case law on both sides of the Atlantic tell a story of judges going to great lengths to deal with new challenges while navigating the imperfections of statutory law - both where it is too broadly formulated and where it is too prescriptive. How can the population's creative potential best be fostered? What do software innovations have in common with the evolution of living organisms? What are the vulnerabilities of distributed creativity? Answers are sought in the processes that came into being during the early years of the digital revolution and were then forced to take a back seat as control of the means of production was increasingly placed in the hands of tech companies. The findings and insights presented here are highly relevant for today's digital policymaking. Market concentration processes in innovation haven't ceased; they are ongoing. And in an age where data-driven services are creating and reinforcing global oligopolies, the question posed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Google v. Oracle is now more relevant than ever: who should hold the keys to digital innovation?
650 0 $a Internet $x Law and legislation. $3 208276
650 1 4 $a IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. $3 823867
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Law, governance and technology series ; $v v.6. $3 559979
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)