國立高雄大學圖資館 |

登入

回首頁

Populism, Twitter and the European public spheresocial media communication in the EP elections 2019 /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Populism, Twitter and the European public sphereedited by Juha Herkman, Emilia Palonen.
其他題名:	social media communication in the EP elections 2019 /
其他作者:	Herkman, Juha.
出版者:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024.
面頁冊數:	xliv, 253 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	Communication in politicsEuropean Union countries.
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5
ISBN:	9783031417375$q(electronic bk.)

Populism, Twitter and the European public spheresocial media communication in the EP elections 2019 /
Populism, Twitter and the European public spheresocial media communication in the EP elections 2019 /[electronic resource] :edited by Juha Herkman, Emilia Palonen. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - xliv, 253 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1-Introduction: European Public Sphere, Populism and Twitter -- Chapter2- Data and Methodology in the Twitter EP2019 Analysis. -PART I Democratic Corporatist Countries. Chapter 3- The Netherlands: Populism from Margins to the Mainstream -- Chapter 4- Germany: Transnationalisation of Populist Radical Right -- Chapter 5- Finland: Populist Polarisation of Finnish Political Communication -- PART II Polarised Pluralist Countries. Chapter 6- Italy: Mixed Populism and Agenda-Setting in Election Campaign -- Chapter 7- Spain: Rising Right-Wing Populism -- PART III Liberal Countries. Chapter 8- Ireland: Emerging Right-Wing Populism -- Chapter 9- The UK: Brexit and Competing Populism -- Chapter 10- Comparison and Conclusions: What Twitter Campaigns Tell Us about Populism and Europeanisation of National Public Spheres?.

This volume approaches the relationship between European public sphere and political communication in the framework of establishing populism and social media. The empirical analysis focuses on the comparison between different EU countries during the 2019 EP elections campaign. The data for the analysis was collected real time from Twitter in the Netherlands, Germany, Finland, Italy, Spain, Ireland and the UK. during a month period and are analyzed with both computerized quantitative and manual qualitative methods. The book introduces a new perspective in conceptualizing populism in comparative analysis, in which populism is understood rather as an antagonist logic of political identity formation than pre-defined political ideologies, movements or party cleavages. We approach implications of populist construction of 'us' and 'not us' in national contexts of 2019 EP election campaigns to find out the relationality between different political actors and parties. A special attention is paid to national/transnational and European/Eurosceptic tendencies in campaign rhetoric. By using a unique idea of 'hashtag publics' we approach the common Twitter discussions around the elections and ask: what particular topics and themes did different political actors distribute over Twitter during the 2019 EP elections, how were various topics and actors linked to each other, and how were campaign agendas and actors linked to populism? Juha Herkman is an Associate Professor of Media and Communication Studies at the University of Helsinki, Finland. Emilia Palonen works as a Senior University Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Helsinki. Chapter-No.1,Chapter-No.4 and Chapter-No. 8 are available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com.

ISBN: 9783031417375$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5doiSubjects--Corporate Names:

446210
European Parliament
--Elections.Subjects--Topical Terms:

294640
Communication in politics
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: JA85.2.E85

Dewey Class. No.: 320.94014

Populism, Twitter and the European public spheresocial media communication in the EP elections 2019 /
LDR:03760nmm a22003495a 4500 001 665260
003 DE-He213
005 20240330115752.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 241219s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031417375$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031417368$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-41737-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JA85.2.E85
072 7 $a JPH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a GTC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPH $2 thema
072 7 $a GTC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 320.94014 $2 23
090 $a JA85.2.E85 $b P831 2024
245 0 0 $a Populism, Twitter and the European public sphere $h [electronic resource] : $b social media communication in the EP elections 2019 / $c edited by Juha Herkman, Emilia Palonen.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2024.
300 $a xliv, 253 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1-Introduction: European Public Sphere, Populism and Twitter -- Chapter2- Data and Methodology in the Twitter EP2019 Analysis. -PART I Democratic Corporatist Countries. Chapter 3- The Netherlands: Populism from Margins to the Mainstream -- Chapter 4- Germany: Transnationalisation of Populist Radical Right -- Chapter 5- Finland: Populist Polarisation of Finnish Political Communication -- PART II Polarised Pluralist Countries. Chapter 6- Italy: Mixed Populism and Agenda-Setting in Election Campaign -- Chapter 7- Spain: Rising Right-Wing Populism -- PART III Liberal Countries. Chapter 8- Ireland: Emerging Right-Wing Populism -- Chapter 9- The UK: Brexit and Competing Populism -- Chapter 10- Comparison and Conclusions: What Twitter Campaigns Tell Us about Populism and Europeanisation of National Public Spheres?.
520 $a This volume approaches the relationship between European public sphere and political communication in the framework of establishing populism and social media. The empirical analysis focuses on the comparison between different EU countries during the 2019 EP elections campaign. The data for the analysis was collected real time from Twitter in the Netherlands, Germany, Finland, Italy, Spain, Ireland and the UK. during a month period and are analyzed with both computerized quantitative and manual qualitative methods. The book introduces a new perspective in conceptualizing populism in comparative analysis, in which populism is understood rather as an antagonist logic of political identity formation than pre-defined political ideologies, movements or party cleavages. We approach implications of populist construction of 'us' and 'not us' in national contexts of 2019 EP election campaigns to find out the relationality between different political actors and parties. A special attention is paid to national/transnational and European/Eurosceptic tendencies in campaign rhetoric. By using a unique idea of 'hashtag publics' we approach the common Twitter discussions around the elections and ask: what particular topics and themes did different political actors distribute over Twitter during the 2019 EP elections, how were various topics and actors linked to each other, and how were campaign agendas and actors linked to populism? Juha Herkman is an Associate Professor of Media and Communication Studies at the University of Helsinki, Finland. Emilia Palonen works as a Senior University Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Helsinki. Chapter-No.1,Chapter-No.4 and Chapter-No. 8 are available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com.
610 2 0 $a European Parliament $x Elections. $3 446210
610 2 0 $a Twitter (Firm) $3 936266
650 0 $a Communication in politics $z European Union countries. $3 294640
650 0 $a Social media $x Political aspects $z European Union countries. $3 905662
650 0 $a Populism $z European Union countries. $3 855416
650 1 4 $a Political Communication. $3 676204
650 2 4 $a Social Media. $3 742054
700 1 $a Herkman, Juha. $3 978032
700 1 $a Palonen, Emilia. $3 978033
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (SpringerNature-41173)