國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge productionby Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray.
Author:	Boisen, Camilla.
other author:	Murray, Matthew C.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024.
Description:	ix, 133 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Education, HigherPhilosophy.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5
ISBN:	9783031654985$q(electronic bk.)

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production
Boisen, Camilla.

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production[electronic resource] /by Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2024. - ix, 133 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction: Why interrogate the Concept of Merit -- Chapter 2: Production and Politique: Establishing Academic Production as Political -- Chapter 3: Merit as Moral: Merit as Moral: Justifications for Applications of Power -- Chapter 4: The Merit Mythology: Merit as Natural Selection -- Chapter 5: Accepting Dissent, Resistance and Error -- Chapter 6: Relegating the Rule of Merit and Escaping 'Academic Fingertrap'.

Academia has long established itself as an institution of knowledge and ideas. Facing pressure, many academic fields and institutions have turned their attention, singularly and collectively, to the task of what to do to rectify the causes of under-representations both academic knowledge itself and who gets to be an academic producer of knowledge. Boisen and Murray argue that simply solving the contemporary symptoms of inequity in ideas, knowledge production and the academy is not enough. Political Theory must be used to analyze why dominant ideas and institutions, namely merit and the resulting meritocracy and meritocratic procedures, were given power in the first place. In using political theory and theories of justice, the book argues that academia must radically shift rather than procedurally reform these methods of evaluation in order to achieve a more coherent approach to diversity in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for producing academic knowledge can be relegated as political tools, allowing true meaningful reform. Boisen and Murray show how contemporary crises in academia around diversification of perspectives can only be solved by considering the justifications of academic knowledge production, and the inherent risk of retaining the established competitive and presumptively 'natural', but ultimately biased, methods of deriving academic authority. Camilla Boisen is a historian of political thought. She is Senior Lecturer of Writing and Associate Dean of Curricular Academic Planning for the Arts & Humanities at New York University, Abu Dhabi. Matthew C. Murray is the Assistant Director for Growthpolicy and Program Support at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Matt runs the interdisciplinary research portal, Growthpolicy, supports the work of M-RCBG's other 18 programs, has 3 previous published titles along with academic articles and taught Philosophy at Providence College for a decade in the fields of Political and Social Philosophy, Ethics and Moral Philosophy.

ISBN: 9783031654985$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

299501
Education, Higher
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: LB2322.2

Dewey Class. No.: 378.001

Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production
LDR:03824nmm a22003375a 4500 001 668290
003 DE-He213
005 20240810124733.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 250107s2024 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031654985$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031654978$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-65498-5
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a LB2322.2
072 7 $a JPA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL010000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 378.001 $2 23
090 $a LB2322.2 $b .B682 2024
100 1 $a Boisen, Camilla. $3 981257
245 1 0 $a Merit, justice, and the political theory of academic knowledge production $h [electronic resource] / $c by Camilla Boisen, Matthew C. Murray.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2024.
300 $a ix, 133 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction: Why interrogate the Concept of Merit -- Chapter 2: Production and Politique: Establishing Academic Production as Political -- Chapter 3: Merit as Moral: Merit as Moral: Justifications for Applications of Power -- Chapter 4: The Merit Mythology: Merit as Natural Selection -- Chapter 5: Accepting Dissent, Resistance and Error -- Chapter 6: Relegating the Rule of Merit and Escaping 'Academic Fingertrap'.
520 $a Academia has long established itself as an institution of knowledge and ideas. Facing pressure, many academic fields and institutions have turned their attention, singularly and collectively, to the task of what to do to rectify the causes of under-representations both academic knowledge itself and who gets to be an academic producer of knowledge. Boisen and Murray argue that simply solving the contemporary symptoms of inequity in ideas, knowledge production and the academy is not enough. Political Theory must be used to analyze why dominant ideas and institutions, namely merit and the resulting meritocracy and meritocratic procedures, were given power in the first place. In using political theory and theories of justice, the book argues that academia must radically shift rather than procedurally reform these methods of evaluation in order to achieve a more coherent approach to diversity in ideas, academic knowledge producers and academic knowledge production, which are necessary to bring about other forms of social change and reform in our larger world. In questioning the ideals and the use of rival ideals to temper flawed concepts, the present motivations and justifications for producing academic knowledge can be relegated as political tools, allowing true meaningful reform. Boisen and Murray show how contemporary crises in academia around diversification of perspectives can only be solved by considering the justifications of academic knowledge production, and the inherent risk of retaining the established competitive and presumptively 'natural', but ultimately biased, methods of deriving academic authority. Camilla Boisen is a historian of political thought. She is Senior Lecturer of Writing and Associate Dean of Curricular Academic Planning for the Arts & Humanities at New York University, Abu Dhabi. Matthew C. Murray is the Assistant Director for Growthpolicy and Program Support at the Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government. Matt runs the interdisciplinary research portal, Growthpolicy, supports the work of M-RCBG's other 18 programs, has 3 previous published titles along with academic articles and taught Philosophy at Providence College for a decade in the fields of Political and Social Philosophy, Ethics and Moral Philosophy.
650 0 $a Education, Higher $x Philosophy. $3 299501
650 0 $a Merit (Ethics) $3 354573
650 0 $a Universities and colleges. $3 179614
650 1 4 $a Political Theory. $3 560010
700 1 $a Murray, Matthew C. $3 584466
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65498-5
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)