國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Rethinking the Needham questiona non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Rethinking the Needham questionby Raymond W. K. Lau.
Reminder of title:	a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
Author:	Lau, Raymond W. K.
Published:	Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2024.
Description:	xvi, 358 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Science and civilization.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0
ISBN:	9789819794720$q(electronic bk.)

Rethinking the Needham questiona non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
Lau, Raymond W. K.

Rethinking the Needham questiona non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /[electronic resource] :by Raymond W. K. Lau. - Singapore :Springer Nature Singapore :2024. - xvi, 358 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Needham Question, dialogism versus Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, and the need to transcend dialogism -- Chapter 3: Analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis: A theoretical-methodological framework -- Chapter 4: Greece and the Needham Question -- Chapter 5: Social essentialism and sociological reductionism concerning Greece in comparison to China -- Chapter 6: The issue of evidence of knowledge transmission across different civilizations -- Chapter 7: Alleged 'cultural obstacles' to knowledge transmission and Huff's 'intellectual curiosity' argument -- Chapter 8: Late-Renaissance scholar agency and the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 9: Cultural essentialism and Cohen's Eurocentric-cum-neo-Eurocentric argument concerning the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 10: Conclusion -- Chapter 11: Appendix - Deconstructing cultural essentialism at root: The 'maritime vs continental civilizations' narrative.

This book offers a new investigation of the Needham Question. Why did modern science emerge in Europe, but not in any of the advanced non-European civilizations? Eurocentric accounts attribute it to certain 'qualities' said to be 'unique' to Europe. Opposed to the Eurocentric view is a position known as the 'dialogical perspective'. Dialogism argues that Europe borrowed heavily from non-European scientific knowledges, and that scientific exchanges were key to the development of modern science. Neo-Eurocentric arguments have emerged in response to the challenge of dialogism, and the debate between Eurocentrism/neo-Eurocentrism and dialogism currently stands at a stalemate. In this book, Raymond Lau brings a new theoretical-methodological framework to finally settle this debate. The historical analysis developed here shows that to secure the non-Eurocentric case, and decisively rebut Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, it is necessary to go beyond dialogism both theoretically and methodologically. Raymond W.K. Lau, PhD, was Professor of Sociology at the Hong Kong Metropolitan University until retirement in 2017; he is currently Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He has published primary research on the philosophies of Xunzi, Laozi, and Zhuangzi. In Intellectual Developments in Greece and China: Contingency, Institutionalization and Path Dependency (2020), he formulated a theoretical-methodological framework for analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis, which also underpins the present work. His research into the Needham Question is an extension from that previous work. He is a co-editor and contributor to the volume titled Multicultural Exchanges in the Making of Modern Science: Needham's Dialogical Vision (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)

ISBN: 9789819794720$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

177570
Science and civilization.

LC Class. No.: CB478

Dewey Class. No.: 303.483

Rethinking the Needham questiona non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism /
LDR:03811nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 673819
003 DE-He213
005 20241224115236.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 250422s2024 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789819794720$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789819794713$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-97-9472-0
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a CB478
072 7 $a JF $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SOC000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 303.483 $2 23
090 $a CB478 $b .L366 2024
100 1 $a Lau, Raymond W. K. $3 982873
245 1 0 $a Rethinking the Needham question $h [electronic resource] : $b a non-Eurocentric framework transcending dialogism / $c by Raymond W. K. Lau.
260 $a Singapore : $b Springer Nature Singapore : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2024.
300 $a xvi, 358 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: The Needham Question, dialogism versus Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, and the need to transcend dialogism -- Chapter 3: Analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis: A theoretical-methodological framework -- Chapter 4: Greece and the Needham Question -- Chapter 5: Social essentialism and sociological reductionism concerning Greece in comparison to China -- Chapter 6: The issue of evidence of knowledge transmission across different civilizations -- Chapter 7: Alleged 'cultural obstacles' to knowledge transmission and Huff's 'intellectual curiosity' argument -- Chapter 8: Late-Renaissance scholar agency and the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 9: Cultural essentialism and Cohen's Eurocentric-cum-neo-Eurocentric argument concerning the breakthrough into modern science -- Chapter 10: Conclusion -- Chapter 11: Appendix - Deconstructing cultural essentialism at root: The 'maritime vs continental civilizations' narrative.
520 $a This book offers a new investigation of the Needham Question. Why did modern science emerge in Europe, but not in any of the advanced non-European civilizations? Eurocentric accounts attribute it to certain 'qualities' said to be 'unique' to Europe. Opposed to the Eurocentric view is a position known as the 'dialogical perspective'. Dialogism argues that Europe borrowed heavily from non-European scientific knowledges, and that scientific exchanges were key to the development of modern science. Neo-Eurocentric arguments have emerged in response to the challenge of dialogism, and the debate between Eurocentrism/neo-Eurocentrism and dialogism currently stands at a stalemate. In this book, Raymond Lau brings a new theoretical-methodological framework to finally settle this debate. The historical analysis developed here shows that to secure the non-Eurocentric case, and decisively rebut Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, it is necessary to go beyond dialogism both theoretically and methodologically. Raymond W.K. Lau, PhD, was Professor of Sociology at the Hong Kong Metropolitan University until retirement in 2017; he is currently Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Hong Kong Shue Yan University. He has published primary research on the philosophies of Xunzi, Laozi, and Zhuangzi. In Intellectual Developments in Greece and China: Contingency, Institutionalization and Path Dependency (2020), he formulated a theoretical-methodological framework for analyzing intellectual development on a non-essentialist basis, which also underpins the present work. His research into the Needham Question is an extension from that previous work. He is a co-editor and contributor to the volume titled Multicultural Exchanges in the Making of Modern Science: Needham's Dialogical Vision (Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)
650 0 $a Science and civilization. $3 177570
650 0 $a Science $x History. $3 187639
650 1 4 $a Science and Technology Studies. $3 773479
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 277156
650 2 4 $a History of Science. $3 212526
650 2 4 $a Sociology of Science. $3 925917
650 2 4 $a Sociology of Knowledge and Discourse. $3 920612
650 2 4 $a World History, Global and Transnational History. $3 739846
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0
950 $a Social Sciences (SpringerNature-41176)