國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

The right to see with technologyrecording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The right to see with technologyby Marc Jonathan Blitz.
Reminder of title:	recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
Author:	Blitz, Marc Jonathan.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025.
Description:	vi, 185 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Conflict of lawsPrivacy, Right ofUnited States.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3
ISBN:	9783031895333$q(electronic bk.)

The right to see with technologyrecording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
Blitz, Marc Jonathan.

The right to see with technologyrecording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /[electronic resource] :by Marc Jonathan Blitz. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - vi, 185 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior,2946-5206. - Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior..

Chapter 1. The Constitution, Enhanced Perception, And Freedom Of Speech And Thought -- Chapter 2. The First Amendment Right To Record And Seeing As "Speech Creation" -- Chapter 3. Freedom Of Thought And Revisiting The Right To Receive Information (With Technology) -- Chapter 4. The Right To Natural And Extended Vision (And Bodily And Mental Integrity) -- Chapter 5: Cognitive Liberty, Privacy, And Extended Perception.

This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones? Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy. This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship focuses on how new technologies related to surveillance, extended reality, and neuroscience raise questions about privacy and freedom of thought and speech.

ISBN: 9783031895333$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1000344
Conflict of laws
--Privacy, Right of--United States.

LC Class. No.: KF1262

Dewey Class. No.: 344.095

The right to see with technologyrecording, augmented perception, and the Constitution /
LDR:03387nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 686219
003 DE-He213
005 20250806165118.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260213s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031895333$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031895326$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-89533-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KF1262
072 7 $a JMM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PSY020000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JMM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 344.095 $2 23
090 $a KF1262 $b .B649 2025
100 1 $a Blitz, Marc Jonathan. $3 775109
245 1 4 $a The right to see with technology $h [electronic resource] : $b recording, augmented perception, and the Constitution / $c by Marc Jonathan Blitz.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2025.
300 $a vi, 185 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior, $x 2946-5206
505 0 $a Chapter 1. The Constitution, Enhanced Perception, And Freedom Of Speech And Thought -- Chapter 2. The First Amendment Right To Record And Seeing As "Speech Creation" -- Chapter 3. Freedom Of Thought And Revisiting The Right To Receive Information (With Technology) -- Chapter 4. The Right To Natural And Extended Vision (And Bodily And Mental Integrity) -- Chapter 5: Cognitive Liberty, Privacy, And Extended Perception.
520 $a This book asks if we have a constitutional right to see or sense our surroundings with technology. Do we have a constitutional right to record our surroundings with cameras embedded in smartphones or drones? Or to enhance our vision with extended reality technology, bionic eyes, or brain-computer interfaces? Courts in the United States have already provided a possible foundation for answering such questions. There is, they have said, a right to document matters of public concern by creating and sharing recordings with others. Such recordings extend our perception: They let us watch events that are remote in space and time. Yet sharing them is also a kind of communication and thus, the creation of "speech" protected by the First Amendment. So too might be other ways of seeing with technology. This emerging case law raises interesting questions and challenges, such as how enhancement of our perceptions can leave room for others' privacy. This book explores such questions, focusing on American constitutional jurisprudence. It also argues that, in doing so, it is helpful to recognize that our interest in using and enhancing our perceptual power isn't only an interest in doing so as part of First Amendment communication. It is also linked closely to other rights - to personal integrity and the liberty to use our body's perceptual powers and to the constitution's protection for freedom of thought or what some scholars call "cognitive liberty:" Our exercise of perception and our use of it to learn about our surroundings is a crucial part of exercising our and shaping our mind. Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship focuses on how new technologies related to surveillance, extended reality, and neuroscience raise questions about privacy and freedom of thought and speech.
650 0 $a Conflict of laws $x Privacy, Right of $z United States. $3 1000344
650 0 $a People with visual disabilities $x Legal status, laws, etc. $z United States. $3 1000345
650 0 $a Privacy, Right of $z United States. $3 185626
650 0 $a Right to health $z United States. $3 1000346
650 0 $a Technology and law $z United States. $3 280688
650 0 $a Video recordings for people with visual disabilities. $3 1000347
650 1 4 $a Neuropsychology. $3 188060
650 2 4 $a Neuroscience. $3 297547
650 2 4 $a Forensic Psychology. $3 920909
650 2 4 $a Cognitive Psychology. $3 273717
650 2 4 $a Socio-Legal Studies. $3 919894
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Palgrave studies in law, neuroscience, and human behavior. $3 775110
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89533-3
950 $a Behavioral Science and Psychology (SpringerNature-41168)