國立高雄大學圖資館 |

The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives /Nathaniel Finn.
Author:	Finn, Nathaniel,
Description:	1 electronic resource (378 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
Notes:	Advisors: Churchill, Eton Committee members: Beglar, David; Doe, Timothy; Elwood, James A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International87-03A.
Subject:	Education.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32121366
ISBN:	9798293803811

The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives /
Finn, Nathaniel,

The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives /Nathaniel Finn. - 1 electronic resource (378 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.

Understanding the developmental trajectories of second language (L2) speaking proficiency is a key focus of language instruction and research. Linguistic development has been analyzed through complexity, accuracy, lexis, and fluency (CALF), whereas interactional development has been examined via conversation-analytic approaches to interactional competence. However, few researchers have integrated these perspectives to examine how linguistic and interactional resources dynamically co-develop, an issue increasingly highlighted in the literature (Eskildsen, 2024; Pekarek Doehler & Eskildsen, 2022). Drawing on Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) (Larsen-Freeman, 2020; van Dijk et al., 2024), in this study I investigate patterns of linguistic and interactional resource use over time and assesses how effectively the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) distinguishes learners across proficiency levels based on these resources. Nine Japanese university students representing three proficiency levels (Intermediate-Low, Intermediate-Mid, Intermediate-High) participated in this longitudinal multiple-case study conducted over one academic year. The participants completed conversation, narration, and role-play tasks during four OPIs administered at approximately three-month intervals. Linguistic performance was quantified using CALF measures, and qualitative analyses employing conversation analysis examined interactional practices such as self-initiated repair and turn-constructional unit-initial discourse markers.CALF analyses revealed distinct developmental trajectories across proficiency levels and tasks. Higher proficiency learners demonstrated balanced gains in complexity (e.g., subordination, words per AS-unit) and fluency (e.g., syllables per minute, mean syllables per run), consistent with predictions from CDST regarding the interconnected, dynamic development of language subsystems (van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005). Lower proficiency learners exhibited pronounced complexity-accuracy trade-offs, supporting the Limited Capacity Model (Skehan, 1996). Fluency measures most clearly aligned with proficiency distinctions, echoing previous findings on fluency's salience in oral proficiency assessment (De Jong et al., 2012; Kahng, 2024). Task-specific affordances (Ferrari, 2012; Tavakoli, 2018) were evident, with role-play tasks eliciting clearer proficiency distinctions than conversation or narration tasks.Analyses of interactional practices demonstrated proficiency-level differences in resource use, aligning with previous findings from interactional competence research (Al-Gahtani & Roever, 2012; Youn, 2015). Lower-proficiency learners predominantly used simple turn-maintenance strategies and basic discourse markers (and and so), whereas higher- proficiency learners employed more complex self-initiated repairs for hedging and rhetorical purposes, indicating interactional competence development (Kim, 2020). Importantly, these interactional practices provided contexts conducive to linguistic development, with repair sequences particularly facilitating increases in syntactic complexity and fluency. These findings offer empirical support for assertions regarding the mutually adaptive nature of linguistic and interactional resources as envisaged by CDST (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008; van Dijk et al., 2024).Finally, the effectiveness of the ACTFL OPI in differentiating proficiency levels based on CALF and interactional practices was critically examined. Fluency and lexical diversity separated proficiency groups to some extent, whereas syntactic complexity and accuracy showed inconsistent differentiation. Interactional resources clearly differentiated lower from higher levels, though distinctions between the Intermediate-Mid and Intermediate-High groups were less distinct, highlighting potential areas for assessment refinement (Roever & Ikeda, 2024; Roever & Kasper, 2018).

English

ISBN: 9798293803811Subjects--Topical Terms:

177995
Education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Accuracy

The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives /
LDR:05429nmm a22004453i 4500 001 693731
005 20260511063017.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 260819s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798293803811
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32121366
035 $a AAI32121366
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Finn, Nathaniel, $e author. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-5349-1702 $3 1010378
245 1 0 $a The Development of L2 English Speaking Ability: Linguistic and Interactional Perspectives / $c Nathaniel Finn.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (378 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisors: Churchill, Eton Committee members: Beglar, David; Doe, Timothy; Elwood, James A.
502 $b Ph.D. $c Temple University $d 2025.
520 $a Understanding the developmental trajectories of second language (L2) speaking proficiency is a key focus of language instruction and research. Linguistic development has been analyzed through complexity, accuracy, lexis, and fluency (CALF), whereas interactional development has been examined via conversation-analytic approaches to interactional competence. However, few researchers have integrated these perspectives to examine how linguistic and interactional resources dynamically co-develop, an issue increasingly highlighted in the literature (Eskildsen, 2024; Pekarek Doehler & Eskildsen, 2022). Drawing on Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) (Larsen-Freeman, 2020; van Dijk et al., 2024), in this study I investigate patterns of linguistic and interactional resource use over time and assesses how effectively the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) distinguishes learners across proficiency levels based on these resources. Nine Japanese university students representing three proficiency levels (Intermediate-Low, Intermediate-Mid, Intermediate-High) participated in this longitudinal multiple-case study conducted over one academic year. The participants completed conversation, narration, and role-play tasks during four OPIs administered at approximately three-month intervals. Linguistic performance was quantified using CALF measures, and qualitative analyses employing conversation analysis examined interactional practices such as self-initiated repair and turn-constructional unit-initial discourse markers.CALF analyses revealed distinct developmental trajectories across proficiency levels and tasks. Higher proficiency learners demonstrated balanced gains in complexity (e.g., subordination, words per AS-unit) and fluency (e.g., syllables per minute, mean syllables per run), consistent with predictions from CDST regarding the interconnected, dynamic development of language subsystems (van Geert & Steenbeek, 2005). Lower proficiency learners exhibited pronounced complexity-accuracy trade-offs, supporting the Limited Capacity Model (Skehan, 1996). Fluency measures most clearly aligned with proficiency distinctions, echoing previous findings on fluency's salience in oral proficiency assessment (De Jong et al., 2012; Kahng, 2024). Task-specific affordances (Ferrari, 2012; Tavakoli, 2018) were evident, with role-play tasks eliciting clearer proficiency distinctions than conversation or narration tasks.Analyses of interactional practices demonstrated proficiency-level differences in resource use, aligning with previous findings from interactional competence research (Al-Gahtani & Roever, 2012; Youn, 2015). Lower-proficiency learners predominantly used simple turn-maintenance strategies and basic discourse markers (and and so), whereas higher- proficiency learners employed more complex self-initiated repairs for hedging and rhetorical purposes, indicating interactional competence development (Kim, 2020). Importantly, these interactional practices provided contexts conducive to linguistic development, with repair sequences particularly facilitating increases in syntactic complexity and fluency. These findings offer empirical support for assertions regarding the mutually adaptive nature of linguistic and interactional resources as envisaged by CDST (Larsen-Freeman & Cameron, 2008; van Dijk et al., 2024).Finally, the effectiveness of the ACTFL OPI in differentiating proficiency levels based on CALF and interactional practices was critically examined. Fluency and lexical diversity separated proficiency groups to some extent, whereas syntactic complexity and accuracy showed inconsistent differentiation. Interactional resources clearly differentiated lower from higher levels, though distinctions between the Intermediate-Mid and Intermediate-High groups were less distinct, highlighting potential areas for assessment refinement (Roever & Ikeda, 2024; Roever & Kasper, 2018).
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0225
650 4 $a Education. $3 177995
650 4 $a Language. $3 180769
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 176897
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 766007
653 $a Accuracy
653 $a Complexity
653 $a Fluency
653 $a Interactional competence
653 $a Second language development
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0441
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Teaching & Learning. $e degree granting institution. $3 1010379
720 1 $a Churchill, Eton $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 87-03A.
790 $a 0225
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32121366