國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows /Mustafa Celalettin Kilinc.
Author:	Kilinc, Mustafa Celalettin,
Description:	1 electronic resource (73 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 87-02.
Notes:	Advisors: Zarecor, Kimberly Committee members: Yang, Aaron; Wu, Chengde; Barakat, Merate.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International87-02.
Subject:	Computer science.
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32164336
ISBN:	9798291580189

Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows /
Kilinc, Mustafa Celalettin,

Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows /Mustafa Celalettin Kilinc. - 1 electronic resource (73 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 87-02.

Architectural design methodologies have consistently evolved toward more effective ways of conveying complex spatial information, particularly as traditional 2D drawings and static 3D models exhibit limitations in representing true scale and experiential attributes, especially within renovation workflows. Augmented Reality (AR) has considerable promise to resolve these issues by overlaying digital information onto the physical world, enhancing designers' perception and interaction capabilities. This thesis empirically compares the usability and user experience of tablet-based AR design systems with traditional 2D screen-based computer systems, concentrating specifically on their efficacy for iterative architectural renovation design tasks. This is an application area in which AR's potential for active design creation remains underexplored.The research used a within-subjects , counterbalanced experimental design, where all 32 participants experienced both the tablet AR and the traditional 2D computer interfaces with alternating order for kitchen renovation tasks. Key metrics include: task performance, perceived usability, and user experience, which assesses both pragmatic (task-related aspects like efficiency and effectiveness) and hedonic qualities (non-task-related aspects like novelty and enjoyment).The results showed significant superiority of tablet AR. The tablet AR modality enabled significantly faster task completion with comparable perceived usability and pragmatic quality. On the other hand, the AR system demonstrated significantly superior hedonic quality score and overall user experience scor e. Qualitative data is parallel to these quantitative results, with the 2D system valued for its familiarity and control despite specific usability flaws, while the AR system was praised for its immersive qualities and its capacity to facilitate issue-spotting; however, challenged by interaction ergonomics and physical demands. In its current situation, this research concludes that tablet AR is a potential replacement tool in architectural renovation design workflows while retaining usability and interaction challenges. The core duality of AR adoption shows the necessity for a phased adoption pathway, capitalizing on its strengths while systematically addressing its identified weaknesses.

English

ISBN: 9798291580189Subjects--Topical Terms:

199325
Computer science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Architectural design

Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows /
LDR:03817nmm a22004333i 4500 001 693739
005 20260511063018.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 260819s2025 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798291580189
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI32164336
035 $a AAI32164336
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Kilinc, Mustafa Celalettin, $e author. $3 1010390
245 1 0 $a Usability and User Experience of 2D Screen vs. Tablet Augmented Reality Design Systems in Architectural Design Workflows / $c Mustafa Celalettin Kilinc.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2025
300 $a 1 electronic resource (73 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 87-02.
500 $a Advisors: Zarecor, Kimberly Committee members: Yang, Aaron; Wu, Chengde; Barakat, Merate.
502 $b M.S. $c Iowa State University $d 2025.
520 $a Architectural design methodologies have consistently evolved toward more effective ways of conveying complex spatial information, particularly as traditional 2D drawings and static 3D models exhibit limitations in representing true scale and experiential attributes, especially within renovation workflows. Augmented Reality (AR) has considerable promise to resolve these issues by overlaying digital information onto the physical world, enhancing designers' perception and interaction capabilities. This thesis empirically compares the usability and user experience of tablet-based AR design systems with traditional 2D screen-based computer systems, concentrating specifically on their efficacy for iterative architectural renovation design tasks. This is an application area in which AR's potential for active design creation remains underexplored.The research used a within-subjects , counterbalanced experimental design, where all 32 participants experienced both the tablet AR and the traditional 2D computer interfaces with alternating order for kitchen renovation tasks. Key metrics include: task performance, perceived usability, and user experience, which assesses both pragmatic (task-related aspects like efficiency and effectiveness) and hedonic qualities (non-task-related aspects like novelty and enjoyment).The results showed significant superiority of tablet AR. The tablet AR modality enabled significantly faster task completion with comparable perceived usability and pragmatic quality. On the other hand, the AR system demonstrated significantly superior hedonic quality score and overall user experience scor e. Qualitative data is parallel to these quantitative results, with the 2D system valued for its familiarity and control despite specific usability flaws, while the AR system was praised for its immersive qualities and its capacity to facilitate issue-spotting; however, challenged by interaction ergonomics and physical demands. In its current situation, this research concludes that tablet AR is a potential replacement tool in architectural renovation design workflows while retaining usability and interaction challenges. The core duality of AR adoption shows the necessity for a phased adoption pathway, capitalizing on its strengths while systematically addressing its identified weaknesses.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0097
650 4 $a Computer science. $3 199325
650 4 $a Computer engineering. $3 212944
650 4 $a Information science. $3 190425
653 $a Architectural design
653 $a Augmented Reality
653 $a Renovation
653 $a User experience
690 $a 0729
690 $a 0984
690 $a 0464
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a Iowa State University. $b Architecture. $e degree granting institution. $3 1010391
720 1 $a Zarecor, Kimberly $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 87-02.
790 $a 0097
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2025
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=32164336