國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An archaeology of the fragment: The...

Civelek, Yusuf.

An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850.
作者:	Civelek, Yusuf.
面頁冊數:	447 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0381.
附註:	Supervisor: David Leatherbarrow.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-02A.
標題:	Architecture.
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3165658
ISBN:	0542005530

An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850.
Civelek, Yusuf.

An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850. - 447 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0381.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.

Although architects before the time of the French Enlightenment often made use of historical forms in their designs, this practice radically changed between the years 1750 and 1850. The fragment itself changed, as did the ways it was used. The transformation of the fragment followed three stages: it changed from the antique, to the elemental, to the historical fragment. Through the course of this transformation, design also changed, it came to be understood as composition. This dissertation describes the history of this transformation in consideration of writings by French author-architects, as well as their designs. It also shows how the new conception of the fragment gave birth to the next stage of architectural history: eclecticism.

ISBN: 0542005530Subjects--Topical Terms:

208437
Architecture.

An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850.
LDR:03717nmm _2200277 _450 001 167321
005 20061005085854.5
008 090528s2005 eng d
020 $a 0542005530
035 $a 00197937
040 $a UnM $c UnM
100 0 $a Civelek, Yusuf. $3 237467
245 1 3 $a An archaeology of the fragment: The transition from the antique fragment to the historical fragment in French architecture between 1750 and 1850.
300 $a 447 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: A, page: 0381.
500 $a Supervisor: David Leatherbarrow.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
520 # $a Although architects before the time of the French Enlightenment often made use of historical forms in their designs, this practice radically changed between the years 1750 and 1850. The fragment itself changed, as did the ways it was used. The transformation of the fragment followed three stages: it changed from the antique, to the elemental, to the historical fragment. Through the course of this transformation, design also changed, it came to be understood as composition. This dissertation describes the history of this transformation in consideration of writings by French author-architects, as well as their designs. It also shows how the new conception of the fragment gave birth to the next stage of architectural history: eclecticism.
520 # $a In the 1830s, a group of pensionnaires argued for freer assembly of architectural elements that would allow diachronic reading of historical fragments as opposed to synchronic antique-looking motifs. Architects like Henri Labrouste, Leon Vaudoyer, and Felix Duban preferred imitating the historical progress of architecture over Greco-Roman elements and compositions. Eclecticism taught them that mixture of antithetical things gave birth to something new after a transitory phase. While neo-classical architecture imitated the mature architectural representation of a distant past, eclectic architecture of the romantic-rationalists imitated the immature expressions of the architecture in transition. The buildings of the second group revealed a new problem of representation in architecture, a problem that had begun to emerge already in the architecture of the eighteenth-century: the problem of style, expressed most famously if pathetically in the early nineteenth-century as a question: "in what style shall we build?".
520 # $a Mid eighteenth-century changes in European architecture were prompted by growing familiarity with recent archaeological work especially in Italy, the country of ancient ruins. In France, antique fragments were adopted initially as formal and spatial motifs that enriched architectural design by means of picturesque effects, inspired by paintings and Piranesian etchings. Later, these fragments gradually became regular elements of architectural composition. Charles Percier and Jean-Nicolas-Louis Durand, two disciples of Boullee, took over his imagery and technique of composing with antique fragments, but relied less than he did on the building's picturesque and sensationalist aspects. Composition in elementary antique fragments underlay the neo-classical architectural education at both the Ecole des Beaux-Arts and the Ecole Polytechnique in the beginning of the nineteenth-century.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 # 0 $a Architecture. $3 208437
690 $a 0729
710 0 # $a University of Pennsylvania. $3 212781
773 0 # $g 66-02A. $t Dissertation Abstracts International
790 $a 0175
790 1 0 $a Leatherbarrow, David, $e advisor
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
856 4 0 $u http://libsw.nuk.edu.tw:81/login?url=http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3165658 $z http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3165658