國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

A cross border study of freezing ord...

Iglikowski, Peter.

A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measuresdoes Mareva rule the waves? /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measuresby Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski.
Reminder of title:	does Mareva rule the waves? /
Author:	Tajti, Tibor.
other author:	Iglikowski, Peter.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018.
Description:	xiii, 89 p. :digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	InjunctionsGreat Britain.
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7
ISBN:	9783319943497$q(electronic bk.)

A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measuresdoes Mareva rule the waves? /
Tajti, Tibor.

A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measuresdoes Mareva rule the waves? /[electronic resource] :by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2018. - xiii, 89 p. :digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in law,2192-855X. - SpringerBriefs in law..

Introduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.

This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the "age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth" has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the 'Freezing Order' in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.

ISBN: 9783319943497$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

819077
Injunctions
--Great Britain.

LC Class. No.: KD7578 / .T358 2018

Dewey Class. No.: 347.4205

A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measuresdoes Mareva rule the waves? /
LDR:02533nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 540696
003 DE-He213
005 20190108114053.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 190308s2018 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319943497$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319943480$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-94349-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KD7578 $b .T358 2018
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LAW016000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 347.4205 $2 23
090 $a KD7578 $b .T135 2018
100 1 $a Tajti, Tibor. $3 819075
245 1 2 $a A cross border study of freezing orders and provisional measures $h [electronic resource] : $b does Mareva rule the waves? / $c by Tibor Tajti, Peter Iglikowski.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2018.
300 $a xiii, 89 p. : $b digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in law, $x 2192-855X
505 0 $a Introduction -- Provisional measures in France and the United Kingdom -- Provisional measures in the United States -- Post-socialist jurisdictions: Provisional measures in Hungary -- The European account preservation order: Nuclear weapon or paper tiger? -- Conclusions and possible ways forward.
520 $a This book compares the law on provisional measures of common law and civil law countries, the goal being to identify and compare their main advantages and disadvantages. The guiding concept is a well-known statement by the Justices of the US Supreme Court expressed in the famous Grupo Mexicano case, according to which the "age of slow-moving capital and comparatively immobile wealth" has now passed, and the 21st century requires a fresh look at the law of provisional measures. In the quest to find a model for interim relief, the Mareva Injunction, subsequently renamed the 'Freezing Order' in the English Civil Procedural Rules, is used as the benchmark to which each of the targeted systems discussed here is compared. This is because international scholarship, as well as e.g. the US Supreme Court, generally consider the Mareva Injunction to be the most effective and farthest-reaching provisional remedy. The analysis suggests that the Mareva Injunction / Freezing Order represents the type of relief that will most likely continue to dominate as the most efficient and farthest-reaching interim measure in the years to come.
650 0 $a Injunctions $z Great Britain. $3 819077
650 0 $a Interlocutory decisions $z Great Britain. $3 819078
650 0 $a Debtor and creditor $z Great Britain. $3 174573
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 207600
650 2 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 530877
650 2 4 $a Business Law. $3 761345
650 2 4 $a European Law. $3 558717
650 2 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 558716
700 1 $a Iglikowski, Peter. $3 819076
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in law. $3 560587
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94349-7
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)