國立高雄大學圖資館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

圖資館首頁

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Senkaku paradox :risking great p...

China

The Senkaku paradox :risking great power war over limited stakes /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Senkaku paradox :Michael E. O'Hanlon.
其他題名:	risking great power war over limited stakes /
其他題名:	Senkaku paradox: risking great power war over small stakes
作者:	O'Hanlon, Michael E.,
面頁冊數:	x, 258 pages :illustrations, maps ;23 cm
標題:	National securityUnited States.
標題:	United States
ISBN:	9780815736899$qpaperback$qalkaline paper

The Senkaku paradox :risking great power war over limited stakes /
O'Hanlon, Michael E.,

The Senkaku paradox :risking great power war over limited stakes /Senkaku paradox: risking great power war over small stakesMichael E. O'Hanlon. - x, 258 pages :illustrations, maps ;23 cm

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Introduction -- Plausible scenarios -- China and Russia scenarios in 2040 -- Military elements of integrated deterrence -- Integrating economics into war plans -- Conclusion and recommendations -- Appendix 1. The so-called revolution in military affairs, 2000-2020 -- Appendix 2. Forecasting change in military technology, 2020-2040.

"In recent years, the Pentagon has elevated its concerns about Russia and China as potential military threats to the United States and its allies. But what issues could provoke actual conflict between the United States and either country? And how could such a conflict be contained before it took the world to the brink of thermonuclear catastrophe, as was feared during the cold war? Defense expert Michael O'Hanlon wrestles with these questions in this insightful book, setting them within the broader context of hegemonic change and today's version of great-power competition. The book examines how a local crisis could escalate into a broader and much more dangerous threat to peace. What if, for example, Russia's "little green men" seized control of a community, like Narva or an even smaller town in Estonia, now a NATO ally? Or, what if China seized one of the uninhabited Senkaku islands now claimed and administered by Japan, or imposed a partial blockade of Taiwan? Such threats are not necessarily imminent, but they are far from inconceivable. Washington could be forced to choose, in these and similar cases, between risking major war to reverse the aggression, and appeasing China or Russia in ways that could jeopardize the broader global order. O'Hanlon argues that the United States needs a better range of options for dealing with such risks to peace. He advocates "integrated deterrence," which combines military elements with economic warfare. The military components would feature strengthened forward defenses as well as, possibly, limited military options against Russian or Chinese assets in other theaters."--Provided by publisher.

ISBN: 9780815736899$qpaperback$qalkaline paper

LCCN: 2019001454Subjects--Topical Terms:

174995
National security
--United States.Subjects--Geographical Terms:

236377
United States

LC Class. No.: UA23 / O36 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 355/.033573

The Senkaku paradox :risking great power war over limited stakes /
LDR:03583nam a2200421 a 4500 001 548368
003 OCoLC
005 20190729210357.0
008 190730s2019 dcuab b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2019001454
019 $a 1048932831
020 $a 9780815736899$qpaperback$qalkaline paper
020 $a 0815736894$qpaperback$qalkaline paper
020 $z 9780815736905$qelectronic book
029 1 $a CHVBK $b 558443850
029 1 $a CHBIS $b 011385289
035 4 9 $a cam 2200409 i 4500
035 $a (OCoLC)1088599779 $z (OCoLC)1048932831
035 $a on1088599779
040 $a DLC $b eng $e rda $c DLC $d OCLCO $d YDX $d BDX $d DBI $d OCLCF $d ZBM $d GZN $d BUF $d WVU $d YDX
042 $a pcc
043 $a n-us--- $a e-ru--- $a a-cc---
049 $a NUKM
050 0 0 $a UA23 $b O36 2019
082 0 0 $a 355/.033573 $2 23
100 1 $a O'Hanlon, Michael E., $e author. $3 827681
245 1 4 $a The Senkaku paradox : $b risking great power war over limited stakes / $c Michael E. O'Hanlon.
246 1 4 $a Senkaku paradox: risking great power war over small stakes
264 1 $a Washington, D.C. : $b Brookings Institution Press, $c [2019]
300 $a x, 258 pages : $b illustrations, maps ; $c 23 cm
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a unmediated $b n $2 rdamedia
338 $a volume $b nc $2 rdacarrier
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $a Introduction -- Plausible scenarios -- China and Russia scenarios in 2040 -- Military elements of integrated deterrence -- Integrating economics into war plans -- Conclusion and recommendations -- Appendix 1. The so-called revolution in military affairs, 2000-2020 -- Appendix 2. Forecasting change in military technology, 2020-2040.
520 $a "In recent years, the Pentagon has elevated its concerns about Russia and China as potential military threats to the United States and its allies. But what issues could provoke actual conflict between the United States and either country? And how could such a conflict be contained before it took the world to the brink of thermonuclear catastrophe, as was feared during the cold war? Defense expert Michael O'Hanlon wrestles with these questions in this insightful book, setting them within the broader context of hegemonic change and today's version of great-power competition. The book examines how a local crisis could escalate into a broader and much more dangerous threat to peace. What if, for example, Russia's "little green men" seized control of a community, like Narva or an even smaller town in Estonia, now a NATO ally? Or, what if China seized one of the uninhabited Senkaku islands now claimed and administered by Japan, or imposed a partial blockade of Taiwan? Such threats are not necessarily imminent, but they are far from inconceivable. Washington could be forced to choose, in these and similar cases, between risking major war to reverse the aggression, and appeasing China or Russia in ways that could jeopardize the broader global order. O'Hanlon argues that the United States needs a better range of options for dealing with such risks to peace. He advocates "integrated deterrence," which combines military elements with economic warfare. The military components would feature strengthened forward defenses as well as, possibly, limited military options against Russian or Chinese assets in other theaters."--Provided by publisher.
650 0 $a National security $z United States. $3 174995
650 0 $a Deterrence (Strategy) $3 248241
650 0 $a Aggression (International law) $3 200914
650 0 $a War $x Economic aspects. $3 215760
650 0 $a Great powers $x History $y 21st century. $3 687558
650 0 $a Geopolitics. $3 294646
650 7 $a Asymmetric warfare. $3 352351
650 7 $a Escalation (Military science) $3 528426
650 7 $a Limited war. $2 fast $3 827682
650 7 $a Military policy. $3 248324
650 7 $a Nuclear threshold (Strategy) $2 fast $3 827683
651 0 $a United States $3 236377
651 0 $a Russia (Federation) $x Foreign relations $z China. $3 434786
651 0 $a China $3 236825
651 7 $a China. $2 gtt $3 475137
651 7 $a United States. $t Constitution. $3 235877
776 0 8 $i Online version: $a O'Hanlon, Michael E., author. $t Senkaku paradox $b First edition. $d Washington, D.C. : Brookings Institution Press, 2019 $z 9780815736905 $w (DLC) 2019009148
938 $a Brodart $b BROD $n 122911032
938 $a YBP Library Services $b YANK $n 15638680
994 $a C0 $b TWNUK