國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair ...

Gless, Sabine.

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter.
Reminder of title:	a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /
other author:	Gless, Sabine.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019.
Description:	xv, 380 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Exclusionary rule (Evidence)
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
ISBN:	9783030125202$q(electronic bk.)

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /
Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /[electronic resource] :edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2019. - xv, 380 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm. - Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice,v.741534-6781 ;. - Ius gentium ;v.11..

Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules - quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules - Is It Time for Change?

Open access.

This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.

ISBN: 9783030125202$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

839158
Exclusionary rule (Evidence)

LC Class. No.: K5471 / .D649 2019

Dewey Class. No.: 347.062

Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial?a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules /
LDR:03130nmm a2200361 a 4500 001 556838
003 DE-He213
005 20191004162057.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 191127s2019 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030125202$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030125196$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-12520-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K5471 $b .D649 2019
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.062 $2 23
090 $a K5471 $b .D631 2019
245 0 0 $a Do exclusionary rules ensure a fair trial? $h [electronic resource] : $b a comparative perspective on evidentiary rules / $c edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a xv, 380 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ius gentium: comparative perspectives on law and justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v v.74
505 0 $a Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules - quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules - Is It Time for Change?
506 $a Open access.
520 $a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People's Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
650 0 $a Exclusionary rule (Evidence) $3 839158
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 530877
650 2 4 $a International Criminal Law. $3 558688
650 2 4 $a Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. $3 823831
650 2 4 $a Criminal Justice. $3 787102
650 2 4 $a Social Justice, Equality and Human Rights. $3 740006
700 1 $a Gless, Sabine. $3 839157
700 1 $a Richter, Thomas. $3 791361
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ius gentium ; $v v.11. $3 558754
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)