國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

How to watch presidential debates without losing itmaking rhetorical lemonade from political lemons /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How to watch presidential debates without losing itby Stephen M. Llano.
Reminder of title:	making rhetorical lemonade from political lemons /
Author:	Llano, Stephen M.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025.
Description:	vii, 120 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Campaign debatesUnited States.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94817-6
ISBN:	9783031948176$q(electronic bk.)

How to watch presidential debates without losing itmaking rhetorical lemonade from political lemons /
Llano, Stephen M.

How to watch presidential debates without losing itmaking rhetorical lemonade from political lemons /[electronic resource] :by Stephen M. Llano. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - vii, 120 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1. Presidential Debating, our Frustrating Democratic Tradition -- 2. The Rise of the Presidential Debates, or How did we get Here? -- 3. Making Commission Debates Valuable, or How to Clean a Rhetorical Mess -- 4. Framework, or Setting The Scene -- 5. Principles, or What Do You Stand For? -- 6. Vision, or What's the Plan? -- 7. Action, or How Candidates Share their Resumes -- 8. Presidential Debating, the Conclusion.

This book offers an answer to the question, "Why are Presidential debates so bad?" The answer could be that the Commission on Presidential Debates ruined them, or it could be that we don't really know how to watch or judge a debate. This book offers both an explanation of how we historically ended up with these terrible debates and how to make lemonade out of them. The book provides a method to watching this madness without going or getting mad yourself, and what perhaps we can say to others about these debates. It concludes with speculation beyond 2024 now that the Commission on Presidential Debates appears to be irrelevant. What types of debate can we expect, and what should we demand? Stephen M. Llano (B.A., Texas A&M; M.A., Syracuse University; Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh) has taught debate at the middle school, high school, and university level. He has lectured on debate extensively in North America, Europe, and Asia in countries such as Japan, Slovenia, and Ukraine. He regularly publishes his work in journals such as Argumentation and Advocacy. He is the founding editor of a the journal Studies in Debate and Oratory, and is host of the debating podcast "In the Bin.".

ISBN: 9783031948176$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-94817-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

327238
Campaign debates
--United States.

LC Class. No.: JF2112.D43

Dewey Class. No.: 328.7302

How to watch presidential debates without losing itmaking rhetorical lemonade from political lemons /
LDR:02712nmm a2200349 a 4500 001 685425
003 DE-He213
005 20250728130254.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260129s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031948176$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031948169$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-94817-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-94817-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JF2112.D43
072 7 $a JPH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a GTC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPH $2 thema
072 7 $a GTC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 328.7302 $2 23
090 $a JF2112.D43 $b L791 2025
100 1 $a Llano, Stephen M. $3 999434
245 1 0 $a How to watch presidential debates without losing it $h [electronic resource] : $b making rhetorical lemonade from political lemons / $c by Stephen M. Llano.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2025.
300 $a vii, 120 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1. Presidential Debating, our Frustrating Democratic Tradition -- 2. The Rise of the Presidential Debates, or How did we get Here? -- 3. Making Commission Debates Valuable, or How to Clean a Rhetorical Mess -- 4. Framework, or Setting The Scene -- 5. Principles, or What Do You Stand For? -- 6. Vision, or What's the Plan? -- 7. Action, or How Candidates Share their Resumes -- 8. Presidential Debating, the Conclusion.
520 $a This book offers an answer to the question, "Why are Presidential debates so bad?" The answer could be that the Commission on Presidential Debates ruined them, or it could be that we don't really know how to watch or judge a debate. This book offers both an explanation of how we historically ended up with these terrible debates and how to make lemonade out of them. The book provides a method to watching this madness without going or getting mad yourself, and what perhaps we can say to others about these debates. It concludes with speculation beyond 2024 now that the Commission on Presidential Debates appears to be irrelevant. What types of debate can we expect, and what should we demand? Stephen M. Llano (B.A., Texas A&M; M.A., Syracuse University; Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh) has taught debate at the middle school, high school, and university level. He has lectured on debate extensively in North America, Europe, and Asia in countries such as Japan, Slovenia, and Ukraine. He regularly publishes his work in journals such as Argumentation and Advocacy. He is the founding editor of a the journal Studies in Debate and Oratory, and is host of the debating podcast "In the Bin.".
650 0 $a Campaign debates $z United States. $3 327238
650 0 $a Presidents $z United States $x Election. $3 300396
650 1 4 $a Political Communication. $3 676204
650 2 4 $a Media Reception and Media Effects. $3 931994
650 2 4 $a Rhetorics. $3 913328
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94817-6
950 $a Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (SpringerNature-41173)