國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversy

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversyedited by Pamela Pietrucci, Leah Ceccarelli.
other author:	Pietrucci, Pamela.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025.
Description:	xvii, 298 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Communication in politics.
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89075-8
ISBN:	9783031890758$q(electronic bk.)

Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversy
Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversy[electronic resource] /edited by Pamela Pietrucci, Leah Ceccarelli. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - xvii, 298 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Rhetoric, politics and society,2947-5155. - Rhetoric, politics and society..

Section I: Scientist Citizens -- Chapter 1: We Feel That It Is No Longer Possible to Remain Uninvolved": A Rhetorical History of the Union of Concerned Scientists -- Chapter 2: What Do We Want? Evidence-Based Claims! When Do We Want It? After Peer Review!: Advocacy and Activism in the March for Science -- Chapter 3: Publish and/or Perish: Scientific Journal Commentary for Social Action in the Climate and Ecological Emergency -- Chapter 4: Activism in Science: Saying No to the Objectionable Appropriation of Research -- Chapter 5: Reflections on a Scientist's Public Engagement: A Dialogue with Roberto Burioni -- Section II: Public Engagement with Science -- Chapter 6: Prodused ethos: Trust, ethos, and expertise in Facebook fan sites for health experts -- Chapter 7: Vituperation and Expert Ethos in Public Science: Censure of Public Health Officials in the COVID-19 Era -- Chapter 8: The Bro as Disingenuous Scientist Citizen -- Chapter 9: Vigilante Pseudoscience in a Science Denialist Data Dashboard -- Chapter 10: The Cook Inlet Beluga Whale: Global Whaling, Oppositional Activism, and Community Science -- Chapter 11: Balancing Acts: Asymmetries of Character and Community.

"Scientists, Politics, and the Rhetoric of Public Controversy is an impressive volume highlighting dynamic interconnections between science, politics, and public life. In addition to critique, the chapters also empower scientists and rhetoricians to debunk misinformation; advocate for science in the face of health, environmental, and democratic crises; and engage in public debate. This is a must read for environmental communication scholars." --Danielle Endres, Professor of Communication and Director of Environmental Humanities Program, University of Utah "Ceccarelli and Pietrucci have assembled timely and useful essays examining the persuasive options for "Scientist Citizens," experts who-individually or collectively, in actions or words-alert the public on the impacts of their research and often face determined backlash. For rhetoricians and scientists, the chapters offer positive and negative models of how to respond to current public crises inflected by science." --Jeanne Fahnestock, Author of Rhetorical Figures in Science" This book examines how scientists around the world embrace their responsibility as citizens, and how science is being used and abused by non-scientists in public spaces. As right-wing politicians, conspiracy theorists, and modern robber barons assault science in the current moment, it is time for the rhetoric of science to reconceptualize itself as a crisis/care discipline. The essays in this volume help us do that by scrutinizing particular cases of science activism, examining the public modalities of resistance that scientists are increasingly taking up as they modify their public engagement to fit evolving rhetorical situations. These essays also reveal how the authority of science is being distorted and exploited by non-experts in ways that are more dangerous than ever in the shadow of climate change and global pandemics. The book ends with a look at new possibilities for collaboration between local communities and scientists and a reflection on how a rhetorical conception of ethos can help us comprehend the negotiation of asymmetries between experts and laypeople in the current era. Pamela Pietrucci is Associate Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Leah Ceccarelli is Professor of Communication at the University of Washington, in Seattle, USA.

ISBN: 9783031890758$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-89075-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

180832
Communication in politics.

LC Class. No.: JA85

Dewey Class. No.: 501.4

Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversy
LDR:04653nmm a2200361 a 4500 001 686507
003 DE-He213
005 20250806173023.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260213s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031890758$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031890741$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-89075-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-89075-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JA85
072 7 $a JPH $2 bicssc
072 7 $a GTC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPH $2 thema
072 7 $a GTC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501.4 $2 23
090 $a JA85 $b .S416 2025
245 0 0 $a Scientists, politics, and the rhetoric of public controversy $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Pamela Pietrucci, Leah Ceccarelli.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2025.
300 $a xvii, 298 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Rhetoric, politics and society, $x 2947-5155
505 0 $a Section I: Scientist Citizens -- Chapter 1: We Feel That It Is No Longer Possible to Remain Uninvolved": A Rhetorical History of the Union of Concerned Scientists -- Chapter 2: What Do We Want? Evidence-Based Claims! When Do We Want It? After Peer Review!: Advocacy and Activism in the March for Science -- Chapter 3: Publish and/or Perish: Scientific Journal Commentary for Social Action in the Climate and Ecological Emergency -- Chapter 4: Activism in Science: Saying No to the Objectionable Appropriation of Research -- Chapter 5: Reflections on a Scientist's Public Engagement: A Dialogue with Roberto Burioni -- Section II: Public Engagement with Science -- Chapter 6: Prodused ethos: Trust, ethos, and expertise in Facebook fan sites for health experts -- Chapter 7: Vituperation and Expert Ethos in Public Science: Censure of Public Health Officials in the COVID-19 Era -- Chapter 8: The Bro as Disingenuous Scientist Citizen -- Chapter 9: Vigilante Pseudoscience in a Science Denialist Data Dashboard -- Chapter 10: The Cook Inlet Beluga Whale: Global Whaling, Oppositional Activism, and Community Science -- Chapter 11: Balancing Acts: Asymmetries of Character and Community.
520 $a "Scientists, Politics, and the Rhetoric of Public Controversy is an impressive volume highlighting dynamic interconnections between science, politics, and public life. In addition to critique, the chapters also empower scientists and rhetoricians to debunk misinformation; advocate for science in the face of health, environmental, and democratic crises; and engage in public debate. This is a must read for environmental communication scholars." --Danielle Endres, Professor of Communication and Director of Environmental Humanities Program, University of Utah "Ceccarelli and Pietrucci have assembled timely and useful essays examining the persuasive options for "Scientist Citizens," experts who-individually or collectively, in actions or words-alert the public on the impacts of their research and often face determined backlash. For rhetoricians and scientists, the chapters offer positive and negative models of how to respond to current public crises inflected by science." --Jeanne Fahnestock, Author of Rhetorical Figures in Science" This book examines how scientists around the world embrace their responsibility as citizens, and how science is being used and abused by non-scientists in public spaces. As right-wing politicians, conspiracy theorists, and modern robber barons assault science in the current moment, it is time for the rhetoric of science to reconceptualize itself as a crisis/care discipline. The essays in this volume help us do that by scrutinizing particular cases of science activism, examining the public modalities of resistance that scientists are increasingly taking up as they modify their public engagement to fit evolving rhetorical situations. These essays also reveal how the authority of science is being distorted and exploited by non-experts in ways that are more dangerous than ever in the shadow of climate change and global pandemics. The book ends with a look at new possibilities for collaboration between local communities and scientists and a reflection on how a rhetorical conception of ethos can help us comprehend the negotiation of asymmetries between experts and laypeople in the current era. Pamela Pietrucci is Associate Professor of Rhetoric at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Leah Ceccarelli is Professor of Communication at the University of Washington, in Seattle, USA.
650 0 $a Communication in politics. $3 180832
650 0 $a Communication in science. $3 225880
650 0 $a Science $x Political aspects. $3 270076
650 0 $a Science $x Moral and ethical aspects. $3 270794
650 1 4 $a Political Communication. $3 676204
650 2 4 $a Comparative Linguistics. $3 275644
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 560010
700 1 $a Pietrucci, Pamela. $3 1000808
700 1 $a Ceccarelli, Leah. $3 1000809
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Rhetoric, politics and society. $3 742384
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89075-8
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)