國立高雄大學圖資館 |

Language: English

Back

Beyond balancinghow states actually respond to threatening adversaries /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Beyond balancingby Fred H. Lawson.
Reminder of title:	how states actually respond to threatening adversaries /
Author:	Lawson, Fred Haley.
Published:	Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025.
Description:	x, 62 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Strategic rivalries (World politics)
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10330-7
ISBN:	9783032103307$q(electronic bk.)

Beyond balancinghow states actually respond to threatening adversaries /
Lawson, Fred Haley.

Beyond balancinghow states actually respond to threatening adversaries /[electronic resource] :by Fred H. Lawson. - Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :2025. - x, 62 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - SpringerBriefs in international relations,2731-3360. - SpringerBriefs in international relations..

Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: A Provisional Bestiary of Bandwagoning -- Chapter 3: Revising the Bestiary of Bandwagoning -- Chapter 4: Japan's 1931 Threat to East Asia -- Chapter 5: Germany's 1939 Threat to East-Central Europe -- Chapter 6: Iran's 2018-20 Threat to the Persian Gulf -- Chapter 7: Conclusion.

This Brief revisits the question of whether states tend to resist a threatening adversary. It begins by assessing one influential contribution to the debate that offers an elegant reformulation of the problem, and then advances a plausible alternative analytical framework. It surveys three situations in which several states faced the choice of mobilizing against or aligning with a prospective aggressor. In each case, proximity to the expansionist state and the clarity of the danger it posed to the existing order might well have prompted adjacent states to engage in balancing. The fact that balancing did not predominate in any of these situations challenges the orthodox view of how states respond to evident threats and compels a reconsideration of the circumstances under which bandwagoning is likely to occur in the anarchic international arena. Building on influential studies of bandwagoning in international politics, the volume reassesses states' responses to aggressive adversaries. It offers an alternative explanation for why states often-indeed, usually-choose not to resist aggressors, and illustrates this argument by revisiting East Asia in 1931 and Central and Eastern Europe in 1938. It also provides a new perspective on the reactions of the Arab Gulf states to the abrogation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

ISBN: 9783032103307$q(electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-032-10330-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

633618
Strategic rivalries (World politics)

LC Class. No.: JZ5595 / .L38 2025

Dewey Class. No.: 327.16

Beyond balancinghow states actually respond to threatening adversaries /
LDR:02745nmm a22003375a 4500 001 689831
003 DE-He213
005 20251108120402.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 260409s2025 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783032103307$q(electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783032103291$q(paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-032-10330-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-032-10330-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JZ5595 $b .L38 2025
072 7 $a JPS $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL011000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPS $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 327.16 $2 23
090 $a JZ5595 $b .L425 2025
100 1 $a Lawson, Fred Haley. $3 1005110
245 1 0 $a Beyond balancing $h [electronic resource] : $b how states actually respond to threatening adversaries / $c by Fred H. Lawson.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer Nature Switzerland : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2025.
300 $a x, 62 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in international relations, $x 2731-3360
505 0 $a Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: A Provisional Bestiary of Bandwagoning -- Chapter 3: Revising the Bestiary of Bandwagoning -- Chapter 4: Japan's 1931 Threat to East Asia -- Chapter 5: Germany's 1939 Threat to East-Central Europe -- Chapter 6: Iran's 2018-20 Threat to the Persian Gulf -- Chapter 7: Conclusion.
520 $a This Brief revisits the question of whether states tend to resist a threatening adversary. It begins by assessing one influential contribution to the debate that offers an elegant reformulation of the problem, and then advances a plausible alternative analytical framework. It surveys three situations in which several states faced the choice of mobilizing against or aligning with a prospective aggressor. In each case, proximity to the expansionist state and the clarity of the danger it posed to the existing order might well have prompted adjacent states to engage in balancing. The fact that balancing did not predominate in any of these situations challenges the orthodox view of how states respond to evident threats and compels a reconsideration of the circumstances under which bandwagoning is likely to occur in the anarchic international arena. Building on influential studies of bandwagoning in international politics, the volume reassesses states' responses to aggressive adversaries. It offers an alternative explanation for why states often-indeed, usually-choose not to resist aggressors, and illustrates this argument by revisiting East Asia in 1931 and Central and Eastern Europe in 1938. It also provides a new perspective on the reactions of the Arab Gulf states to the abrogation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
650 0 $a Strategic rivalries (World politics) $3 633618
650 0 $a International relations. $3 174750
650 1 4 $a International Relations Theory. $3 774425
650 2 4 $a International Security Studies. $3 774426
650 2 4 $a Foreign Policy. $3 747812
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 273601
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in international relations. $3 920362
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-10330-7
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)